NAM2019
  • NAM2021
    • Contacts
  • Science
    • Science Programme
    • Plenary Talks
    • Parallel Sessions
    • Special Lunches/Discussion Sessions
    • Poster Session
    • NAM Community Session
  • Social
    • Presidential Address
    • Herschel Concert
    • RAS Awards Ceremony
    • Virtual Stonehenge Tour
  • Media
  • Public Engagement
    • Public engagement opportunities
    • Public talk
    • Writing Skyscapes
  • Venue
    • Code of Conduct
    • Accessing the conference
    • Gather.town
    • NAM2021 Slack
    • About Bath
  • NAM2021
    • Contacts
  • Science
    • Science Programme
    • Plenary Talks
    • Parallel Sessions
    • Special Lunches/Discussion Sessions
    • Poster Session
    • NAM Community Session
  • Social
    • Presidential Address
    • Herschel Concert
    • RAS Awards Ceremony
    • Virtual Stonehenge Tour
  • Media
  • Public Engagement
    • Public engagement opportunities
    • Public talk
    • Writing Skyscapes
  • Venue
    • Code of Conduct
    • Accessing the conference
    • Gather.town
    • NAM2021 Slack
    • About Bath

Poster

id
Quantitative comparison of high latitude ionospheric electric field models
Open Session MIST Science
Lauren
Orr
Date Submitted
2021-04-30 00:00:00
Lancaster University
L. Orr (Lancaster University), A. Grocott (Lancaster University), M.-T Walach (Lancaster University), G. Chisham (British Antarctic Survey), M.P. Freeman (British Antarctic Survey), R.M. Shore (British Antarctic Survey), M.M. Lam (British Antarctic Survey)
The Space Weather Instrumentation, Measurement, Modelling and Risk: Thermosphere (SWIMMR-T) programme aims to improve the UK’s ability to specify and forecast the thermosphere. AENeAS (Advanced Ensemble electron density [Ne] Assimilation System) is a physics-based, thermosphere-ionosphere, coupled, assimilative model, which makes possible thermospheric forecasts. Currently AENeAS uses the Heelis and Weimer electric field spacecraft climatology models but it is possible a more recent electric field model will improve its functionality. The new models include three statistical models for ionospheric convection using line-of-sight velocity measurements from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): Thomas and Shepherd (TS18), the Time-Variable Ionospheric Electric Field model (TiVIE) and the empirical orthogonal functions (BAS EOF) model. Before implementation in AENeAS, we first compare the new SuperDARN-based models to the established spacecraft climatology models.

Here we present quantitative comparison of the electric-field models across a variety of geophysical conditions, including during storm times. To allow for fair comparison between models we explore methods of standardizing the input parameters using pre-existing equations. Once standardized, each model’s ionospheric convection patterns can be compared for varying solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions. We explore the relationships between the IMF conditions and model output parameters such as the polar cap transpolar voltage and size. During storms we compare the parameterized model output time series from the different electric field models, including the commonly used SuperDARN Map Potential Model. At peak storm times we find the calculated electric potential magnitude to be much greater from the spacecraft-based models. We will discuss the similarities and differences found using each method.

NAM 2020 Logo AWRAS Logo

 

Bath University LogoUKRI STFC new

All attendees are expected to show respect and courtesy to other attendees and staff, and to adhere to the NAM Code of Conduct.

© 2022 Royal Astronomical Society

Login